LEV Route To Control® – A Practical Lifecycle Approach for Duty Holders

Local Exhaust Ventilation (LEV) systems remain one of the most effective engineering controls available for reducing employee exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace.

However, many LEV systems fail to achieve effective control not because the equipment itself is inadequate, but because key stages in the process — such as risk assessment, specification, design or maintenance — have been overlooked.

For duty holders, effective LEV management should be viewed as a complete lifecycle process rather than a single compliance exercise.

Our LEV Route To Control® provides a structured approach to help organisations achieve effective, sustainable and compliant exposure control.

Why LEV Management Matters

Under the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health (COSHH) Regulations, employers have a duty to assess and control employee exposure to hazardous substances.

These substances may include:

  • dusts
  • fumes
  • vapours
  • gases
  • mists
  • biological agents

 

Poorly performing LEV systems can lead to:

  • increased employee health risks
  • enforcement action
  • operational disruption
  • failed audits
  • unnecessary energy and maintenance costs
  • ineffective contaminant control despite apparent compliance

 

An LEV system should not simply “exist” — it must be suitable, effective and maintained throughout its operational life.

The LEV Route To Control®

Step One – Risk Assessment

Every successful LEV system starts with a suitable and competent risk assessment.

This stage identifies:

  • the hazardous substances generated
  • how exposure occurs
  • who may be affected
  • the level and duration of exposure
  • whether LEV is the most appropriate control solution

 

Errors at this stage can result in poorly targeted control measures and systems that fail to protect operators effectively.

A competent assessment should also consider:

  • maintenance activities
  • workplace exposure limits
  • existing control measures
  • process changes
  • combined exposure risks

 

The risk assessment forms the foundation for every stage that follows.

Step Two – Specification

A clear and practical specification is critical to achieving effective LEV performance.

The specification stage defines exactly what the LEV system is required to do and ensures that operational, engineering and compliance requirements are aligned from the outset.

Developing an effective specification often requires collaboration between:

  • duty holders
  • operators
  • engineers
  • LEV specialists
  • maintenance teams

 

A suitable specification should consider:

  • the contaminant source and behaviour
  • operator interaction with the process
  • required levels of containment or capture
  • hood selection and positioning
  • airflow requirements
  • maintenance and access arrangements
  • future testing and monitoring requirements

 

Poor specifications are one of the most common causes of underperforming LEV systems. A system may appear operational while still failing to adequately control exposure.

Step Three – Design

LEV design is a specialist discipline and has a direct impact on system effectiveness.

Good LEV design focuses on capturing or containing hazardous contaminants before they enter the operator’s breathing zone.

Effective design requires an understanding of:

  • how contaminants are generated
  • how contaminant clouds behave
  • airflow movement within the process
  • operator positioning
  • external air influences such as fans or air supply systems

 

Hood design and placement are particularly important. The greater the degree of enclosure around the process, the more likely the system is to achieve effective control.

Poor design can lead to:

  • contaminant escape
  • operator exposure
  • excessive energy use
  • inconsistent system performance

 

Step Four – Installation

Even well-designed LEV systems can fail if installation standards are poor.

Installation should ensure the system has been assembled correctly, all components are suitable and airflow paths are unobstructed.

For more complex systems, installation may involve:

  • verifying utilities and services
  • assembling ductwork and extraction components
  • checking fan operation and direction
  • confirming access for testing and maintenance
  • balancing airflow throughout the system
  • identifying and correcting installation defects

 

Attention to detail during installation helps avoid performance issues later during commissioning and operation.

Step Five – Commissioning

Commissioning confirms that the LEV system is capable of achieving adequate control under normal operating conditions.

This is one of the most important stages in the LEV lifecycle, yet it is often underestimated.

A robust commissioning process should include:

  • installation verification
  • airflow and performance testing
  • assessment of control effectiveness
  • recording of system performance data
  • reporting and documentation

 

Where existing LEV systems have limited documentation, performance testing becomes particularly important in establishing whether adequate control is being achieved.

Commissioning should provide duty holders with confidence that the system performs as intended in practice — not just in theory.

Step Six – Service and Maintenance

LEV systems require ongoing maintenance to remain effective.

Over time, filters block, ductwork degrades, airflow changes and mechanical components wear. Without planned maintenance, even a well-designed system can gradually lose effectiveness.

A maintenance programme should include:

  • routine inspections
  • fan and motor maintenance
  • filter replacement
  • belt checks
  • airflow monitoring
  • record keeping

 

Maintenance records should be retained within the LEV logbook to support compliance and demonstrate ongoing system management.

Well-maintained systems are more reliable, more energy efficient and more likely to continue providing effective exposure control.

Step Seven – Routine Thorough Examination and Test (TExT)

Routine Thorough Examination and Test (TExT) is essential for verifying that the LEV system continues to achieve adequate control during normal operation.

Under COSHH Regulation 9, LEV systems should be thoroughly examined and tested at suitable intervals, typically at least every 14 months unless more frequent examination is required.

However, effective TExT should go beyond basic airflow readings.

Our LEV Control Review process uses a four-stage approach:

  • Stage 1 – Desktop Study
  • Stage 2 – Visual Inspection
  • Stage 3 – Technical Measurements
  • Stage 4 – Reporting

 

This process helps duty holders understand:

  • whether the system remains effective
  • whether exposure risks have changed
  • whether maintenance issues are affecting performance
  • whether operational changes have impacted control

 

Regular review helps organisations maintain compliance while supporting long-term employee health protection.

Effective LEV Requires a Lifecycle Approach

Effective LEV management is not achieved through testing alone.

Duty holders should view LEV as a continuous lifecycle process involving:

  • competent risk assessment
  • clear specification
  • effective design
  • quality installation
  • robust commissioning
  • planned maintenance
  • ongoing review and testing

 

When these stages work together, organisations are more likely to achieve:

  • effective exposure control
  • improved employee protection
  • reduced operational risk
  • stronger regulatory compliance
  • improved system reliability and performance

 

A well-managed LEV system is not only a compliance requirement — it is an important investment in workplace health, operational resilience and long-term business performance.

If you would like support with LEV risk assessment, commissioning, TExT or lifecycle management, speak to our LEV specialists.